Bill Nye Proposes Silencing Climate ‘Deniers’

Salon Website and Bill Nye have evidently taken a page from the climate dogmatists’ playbook and decided to label any climate realists with the derogatory term “deniers,” linking them to holocaust deniers, an offensive smear the Associated Press requires its writers to avoid.  

For Nye, a climate denier is anyone who rejects all or part of the claim, “Humans, primarily through the burning of fossil fuels for energy resulting in and the emission of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, are causing potentially catastrophic climate change, which governments must act now to prevent by restricting fossil fuel use.”

With all due respect to Nye--and I don't believe he’s due much respect in this--thousands of researchers, scientists and educated persons around the globe reject some or all of the anthropogenic global warming (AGW) theory.   Among them are Dr. Roy Spencer, Dr. John Christy, John Coleman (the founder of The Weather Channel) and countless others.

According to Nye--who isn't a scientist at all, but just a guy who pretends to be a scientist on TV--the time for debate is over.  “We know exactly why the climate is changing—it’s human activity!” he said.  

Thus Nye proposes a surefire shortcut to motivate individuals and government to fight climate change: refuse all scientific discussion of the matter.  “Get the deniers out of our discourse,” Nye said.  “You know, we can’t have these people—they’re absolutely toxic.  And so part of the message in this book is to get the deniers out of the picture.”

Nye is the real denier here. He denies the simple fact that credible, peer-reviewed, published, award-winning climate researchers are producing evidence every day calling into question the extent of humankind’s role in climate change.  These prominent “deniers” rightly question whether carbon dioxide is a pollutant … or a valuable, naturally occurring gas that is vital to plant growth.  They also question whether a modest warming, if it should occur, would be beneficial rather than harmful to humanity and the environment.

I’ll take the word of award-winning physicists, climatologists, and meteorologists, including Richard Lindzen, Ph.D., William Gray, Ph.D., S. Fred Singer, Ph.D., Pat Michaels, Ph.D., David Legates, Ph.D., Willie Soon, Ph.D., Judith Curry, Ph.D., Bob Balling, Ph.D., Freeman Dyson, Ph.D.,William Happer, Ph.D., Robert Carter, Ph.D., and any of the hundreds of other credible scientists in the United States and abroad I could name who are skeptical of one or more aspects of the AGW meme over that of the former host of a children’s TV show.

The climate models predicted more intense hurricanes, yet for nearly a decade the United States has experienced far fewer than the historic average number of hurricanes making landfall, and they have been no more powerful than previously experienced.  Sea-level rise has slowed, polar bear numbers have increased, Antarctica is gaining ice, the Arctic is back to average ice levels for the decade, and crop production continues to set records year over year.  Each of these points contradicts predictions made by IPCC and other climate alarmists.

It is interesting to note that CFACT interviewed Bill Nye last week and asked him if people who deny Climate Change should be in prison alongside war criminals.  His response:

"Was it appropriate to jail the guys at Enron? Was it appropriate to jail people from the cigarette industry who insisted that this addictive product was not addictive?

“In these cases, for me as a taxpayer and voter, the introduction of this extreme doubt about climate change is affecting my quality of life as a public citizen. So I can see where people are very concerned about this and are pursuing criminal investigations as well as in engaging in discussions like this.”

In other words, Nye, like the rest of the totalitarian left, thinks that it is at least worth seriously contemplating the criminal prosecution of anyone who disagrees with the climate change orthodoxy to which he clings.  This is not open-minded debate but the ruthless quashing of dissent.  

Although television gave him a big megaphone, the scientific evidence drowns him out.  That explains his eagerness to silence those who disagree with him.

As things heat up in our country (pardon the pun) and great pressure is brought upon people who question Anthropogenic Global Warming or  Anthropogenic-defined Sexuality (homosexuality & other perversions), take heart.  Prove all things, hold fast to the Word and to your faith.

"But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you,  that you may be sons of your Father in heaven.  For He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust" (Matthew 5:44-45). 

Read more here.