McCullough/Risch Paper Censored by the Lancet
A review of 325 autopsies performed on people who died shortly after having been “vaccinated” by the Covid-19 “vaccine” found that almost three quarters (74%) of those deaths were caused by the vaccine.
The paper, a pre-print that was awaiting peer-review, was written by Dr. Peter McCullough, Yale epidemiologist Dr. Harvey Risch and several of their colleagues at the Wellness Company and was published online on Wednesday, July 5th, on the pre-print site of the prestigious British medical journal, The Lancet.
Less than 24 hours later, however, the study was removed from the Lancet site and a note appeared stating: “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”
The original study abstract can be found in the Internet Archive. It reads (with my emphasis added):
Background: The rapid development and widespread deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, spike protein-associated tissue damage, thrombogenicity, immune system dysfunction and carcinogenicity. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate possible causal links between COVID-19 vaccine administration and death using autopsies and post-mortem analysis.
Methods: We searched for all published autopsy and necropsy reports relating to COVID-19 vaccination up until May 18th, 2023. We initially identified 678 studies and, after screening for our inclusion criteria, included 44 papers that contained 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death.
Findings: The most implicated organ system in COVID-19 vaccine-associated death was the cardiovascular system (53%), followed by the hematological system (17%), the respiratory system (8%) and multiple organ systems (7%). Three or more organ systems were affected in 21 cases. The mean time from vaccination to death was 14.3 days. Most deaths occurred within a week from last vaccine administration. A total of 240 deaths (73.9%) were independently adjudicated as directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination.
Interpretation: The consistency seen among cases in this review with known COVID-19 vaccine adverse events, their mechanisms and related excess death, coupled with autopsy confirmation and physician-led death adjudication, suggests there is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases. Further urgent investigation is required for the purpose of clarifying our findings.
McCullough and Risch are extraordinarily well qualified, and it is hard to imagine that the methodology of their review was so poor that it warranted removal at initial screening rather than allowing the paper to go through the peer-review process. Clearly, this is blatant censorship, exactly the type of censorship and heavy-handed narrative control that we have seen throughout the Covid saga.
The Hive, including the governmental/pharmaceutical axis, is still trying to brazen it out with the Big Lie, with complete North Korean style-denial of the obvious truth. The CDC has not yet acknowledged a single death caused by the Covid mRNA vaccines. Autopsy evidence demonstrating that the vaccine is killing people is obviously not what the Hive and the public health establishment wants to see. They will got to great lengths to bury the information.
For now, we are left with indirect evidence that the Covid vaccine/bioweapon is killing large numbers of people, evidence like the actuarial excess death statistics.
Dr. Harvey Risch told the Daily Sceptic that he deems it “pure Government-directed censorship, even after the Missouri v. Biden injunction.”
Steve Bannon interviewed Dr. Harvey Risch about the article in the “a” block of the fourth hour of his show on Friday afternoon. Risch stated:
“It was a compilation of 44 studies that were extensively searched to find . . . It was there, it was getting a lot of attention, apparently some hundreds of downloads per minute, after people started recognizing it, until, within about 24 hours, the publisher (Elsevier) removed the paper from the website . . .
Bannon: We’re not going to get back to the America we love until we have a full and frank discussion with all the scientific evidence of this. I think what people are concerned about, myself and others who are not scientists, is that we have renowned publications like Lancet, one of the top publications in the world, and . . . soon as this is put up, it is taken down. Are we still in a situation of massive censorship about having an adult conversation based upon science, based upon facts, about the entire pandemic and particularly things like the vaccines?
Dr. Harvey Risch: Yes, and I’m laughing because Lancet, if you’ll remember, was one of the two journals that published the fake Surgisphere papers that supposedly went through real peer review, and got published and were up for two weeks before Lancet was forced to have the authors retract them, because they were based upon fraudulent data in the first place.
So, a journal that is credulous when it comes to government-approved messaging, and slams the door on independent scientific results that are consistent with what we know now about many of the untoward adverse chemical and biological mechanisms these vaccines do—that is forbidden to be published. Now I’m not sure whether Elsevier, the publisher, is engaged in the “trusted news initiative” as so many publishers and media around the world are today.
Bannon: From what you’ve extrapolated from the research on the autopsies, what further research would you call for right now that you think has to be done, so that we can have a more fulsome conversation on this. Where would you like to see it go with more basic research on this?
Risch: The science has to be open, the science has to be publishable. We’ve now submitted this paper to five journals who have all rejected it, and we’re going to keep submitting it until it gets to a journal that will review it; the journals will not even send it out for peer-review.
So, obviously there is a cabal of medical publishing that is controlled by non-academic, non-scientific interests, that are preventing discussion of things medical, things scientific, about most aspects related to the pandemic and treatment, vaccination, that non-pharmaceutical interventions that didn’t work, and so on, that makes this an objective conversation. Until we have an objective conversation, and not smearing, that every time anyone of these papers or voices, says, “there is this stuff going on” and they are all labeled as conspiracy theorists, and suppressed, until we have an open and objective interaction, conversation where the other side is not just smearing us and calling us names, and conspiring to censor, but actually comes out and says, “well, here is our data, here is why we believe what we believe.”
“Until that happens, we are not getting any adequate, satisfying way of understanding what went on, and trust that the people who did this to us, to the country, to the scientific establishment – we have no trust that they are doing anything objective. They are only using the tools of what we call “scientism” to make things look like they are scientific when they are not, and not actually dealing with scientific questions. So we have no trust in all these agencies of government, and the government itself.”
Model Dies by Assisted Suicide After Vaccine Injury
Last year, an actress and model named Katerina Pavelek got the booster shot. Shortly thereafter, she came down with a rare, incurable neurological illness. Feeling that there was no other way to end her suffering, Pavelek opted for assisted suicide in a Swiss clinic.
Katerina Pavelek, 41, received her Covid-19 booster shot over a year ago. Pavelek thought the jab would improve her immune system – instead, it did the opposite, and she suffered heavily as a result; she was diagnosed with an incurable chronic neurological illness known as myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS), a long-term illness with a wide range of symptoms that affects daily activities.
On June 1, 2023, Pavelek told her Instagram followers that she was going to end her life via assisted suicide. "Hi guys, over the last 10 days I became severely ill again, homebound unable to do much," she wrote. "My body is too weak to fight this illness and I have no more strength so I made decision to end my life at Pegasos association in Switzerland. I was diagnost with untreatable chronic neurological illness ME/CFS caused by booster jab on top of having suspected respiratory ALS."
"This illness made me disabled, unable to work or have social life and unable to enjoy life all together. Breathing have become more and more difficult and painful for me and my lung function has been declining. Thank you for all your friendship and support over last year. The booster jab I received over [a] year ago destroyed my health, my body and my life completely. There is no other way to end my suffering other than the decision I made."
Those of us who visit conservative news aggregation sites (e.g., Citizen Free Press, Whatfinger) see these types of stories almost every day. Almost every day, there is another story of a young, healthy athlete dropping dead of heart failure, e.g., 28 year-old pro basketballer Oscar Cabrera dying of heart problems that he knew were caused by the clot shot, or a young Australian mom now wheelchair bound) but these stories, although common, are still being suppressed by media and not acknowledged by anyone in government or in the pharmaceutical industrial complex.
COVID-19 and Vaccine Sevenfold Increase in Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
A sudden increase in Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS)—a rare and potentially fatal skin disorder—may be triggered by COVID-19, increased vaccination rates, or a lowered threshold caused by vaccines or previous infection.
Researchers with the burn unit at Concord Repatriation General Hospital in Australia saw two to four cases of SJS, or toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), per year prior to COVID-19. In the first six months of 2022 alone, the same burn center observed a sevenfold rise in cases.
Of the 14 reported cases, five patients had COVID-19 a month before developing SJS/TEN, and three of 14 patients received a COVID-19 vaccine one month prior. Not a single case of SJS/TEN was reported in an unvaccinated individual. Researchers said the rapid rise in cases since the beginning of the pandemic and vaccine rollout is “alarming.”
SJS/TEN is a severe hypersensitivity condition where the skin develops rashes, blisters, and peels forming painful areas that resemble a severe hot water burn. Mucous membranes, including the eyes, genitalia, and mouth, are often affected or severely damaged, leading to sepsis, pneumonia, infection, or death.
Although SJS and TEN were once considered separate conditions, they are now part of the same disease—with SJS representing the less severe end of the disease spectrum and TEN representing the most severe.
Wall Street Journal: Covid Censorship Proved to be Deadly
Bret Swanson writes in the WSJ: Digital censorship supercharged the effort to hide reality, but reality is getting its day in court. On July 4, U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty temporarily blocked numerous federal agencies and the White House from collaborating with social-media companies and third-party groups to censor speech. Discovery in Missouri v. Biden exposed relationships among government agencies and social-media firms and revealed an additional layer of university centers and self-styled disinformation watchdogs and fact-checking outfits.
In other words, in addition to the thousands of federal agents tasked with monitoring social media and and demanding that the tech firms delete anyone not supporting the official Covid narrative, there is an additional layer of government-funded censorship and narrative engineering operations based at universities. These academia-based operations are developing AI machines that can censor massively with a mouse-click.
What has resulted from the unprecedented censorship operations:
Twitter blacklisted Stanford physician and economist Jay Bhattacharya for showing Covid almost exclusively threatened the elderly, severely reducing the visibility of his tweets.
When Stanford health policy scholar Scott Atlas began advising the White House, YouTube erased his most prominent video opposing lockdowns.
Twitter banned Robert Malone, a pioneer of mRNA vaccine technology, for calling attention to the vaccines’ dangers.
YouTube demonetized evolutionary biologist Bret Weinstein, who suggested the virus might be engineered and predicted vaccine-evading variants.
Social-media platforms were powerful tools in the astonishingly massive censorship operation, but they did not act alone. Medical schools, medical boards, science journals and legacy media sang from the same hymnal. Legions of doctors stayed quiet after witnessing the demonization of their peers who challenged the Covid orthodoxy. You only need to destroy a few prominent people and everyone else will dutifully self-censor, carefully watching what they say. Millions of lives were lost or harmed as a result.
Although it was clear early on that children were not threatened by Covid, health authorities in both the public and private sectors insisted that young people were vulnerable, and demanded that toddlers wear masks. It was pure sadism.
These “experts” denied that those who had recovered from Covid had natural immunity, a phenomenon we’ve known about since the Plague of Athens in 430 B.C. They effectively prohibited generic drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration, such as azithromycin and ivermectin, which low-income nations around the world were deploying successfully.
The U.S. government spent $6 trillion to buoy its shuttered economy, and most people got Covid anyway. Worst of all, the lockdowns and mandates resulted in unprecedented bad health outcomes for young and middle-aged people in rich countries.
Excess mortality in most high-income nations was worse in 2021 and 2022 than in 2020, the initial pandemic year. Many poorer nations with less government control seemed to fare better. Sweden, which didn’t have a lockdown, performed better than nearly every other advanced nation.
After navigating 2020 with relative success, young and middle-age people in rich nations began dying in unprecedented numbers in 2021 and 2022, suffering premature death heart attacks, strokes, pulmonary embolisms, kidney failure and cancer, all obviously adverse reactions to the vaccine.
“They lie to one another; they speak with flattering lips and a double heart. May the Lord cut off all flattering lips and every boastful tongue. They say, “With our tongues we will prevail. We own our lips—who can be our master?” Psalm 12:2-4