By May 2024 the United Nations World Health Organization(WHO) could be earth’s first truly global government. Through the combination of a new global pandemic accord called “Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness, and Response,”(PPPR)(1), and amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations(IHR),(2) the documents as presently drafted “would fundamentally change the relationship between the WHO, its Member States, and naturally their populations.”(3) There will exist a non-accountable, fascist system of governance.(4)
WHO is a global bureaucracy of appointees. Starting in 1948, the goal was access to better health. But since 2000, WHO has become heavily dependent on private foundations and pharmaceutical companies for funding. Power has shifted from nation states to mega-corporations. WHO amended its pandemic definition in 2009 enabling lockdowns in 2020. “Herd immunity” was also redefined, and mass vaccination became primary. Abandoning its stated principles, WHO now minds the machinery of global population control.
According to the Brownstone Institute’s David Bell,
The WHO proposes that the term ‘with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons’ be deleted from the text [of the IHR], replacing them with ‘equity, coherence, inclusivity,’ vague terms the applications of which are then specifically differentiated in the text according to levels of social and economic development. The underlying equality of individuals is removed, and rights become subject to a status determined by others based on a set of criteria that they define.(5)
Under new IHR article 13A, states are required to follow WHO recommendations, and could be compelled to incarcerate, inject, require identification of medical status, medically examine, isolate, and/or restrict the travel of individuals.
The proposed legally-binding agreements would incorporate WOS and WOG models of operation—Whole-of-Society and Whole-of-Government. These envision the enlistment of people at all levels into the support of a single narrative for the common good. Government, the medical cartel, social and other media, banks, lawyers, and other professionals would be be mustered in support of a single preferred story handed down by the WHO. The WOS approach means that religious organizations, churches, churches owning hospitals, etcetera, will all be expected to support a single story.
The proposed accord especially addresses wrongthink. In Article 1.c the proposed PPPR Accord defines terms:
‘Info-demic’ means too much information, false, or misleading information, in digital and physical environments during a disease outbreak. It causes confusion and risk-taking behaviors that can harm health. It also leads to mistrust of health authorities, and undermines the public health and social measures.(6)
Article 18.1 of the PPPR accord states
The Parties shall strengthen science, public health, and pandemic literacy in the population, as well as access to information on pandemics, and their effects and drivers, combat false, misleading, misinformation or disinformation, including through effective international collaboration and cooperation, as referred to in Article 16.(7)
Governments signing the accord are required to act against content having been labeled as false, misleading, misinformation, or disinformation. But how can this commitment be reconciled with America’s Constitutional right to free speech?(8)
Of special concern under the PPPR are the powers granted its Director-General:(9)
1. The Director-General shall determine, on the basis of information received, in particular from the State Party within whose territory any event is occurring, whether an event constitutes a public health emergency of international concern in accordance with the criteria and the procedure set out in these regulations.
This empowers a single individual to declare a PHEIC, a Public Health Emergency of International Concern. With one stroke of his pen, such a declaration enables the local rule of law to be replaced by the WHO’s rule of emergency.
The accord also requires nations to embrace WHO’s “One Health” emphasis. One Health is a technocratic approach combining study and management of people, animals, plants, and the environment. While seeking to study interrelationships and gain new insights, it also proposes to manage these resources globally. The United States CDC has already adopted the One Health approach advocated by the UN, WEF, and others.(10) The PPPR requires signatory nations to adopt the One Health approach. One Health is broader than many realize, including the global food supply.
Revelation 13:16 describes a global economic lockout of those who resist the exercise of power to compel conscience. The machinery to enforce compliance on a global scale has never before existed, and would have to be deployed before enacting such commands.(12)
In summary, the Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response accord due to be signed in May 2024, along with changes to WHO International Health regulations, is ominous. These changes include granting powers to one unelected individual to declare a public health emergency anywhere globally suspending the rule of law, the power to compel persons to be vaccinated or incarcerated, the use of One Health ideology to control human populations and control resources including food on the basis of climate change theory, and herald an unprecedented surrender of liberty. Interestingly, 2,000 years ago Bible prophecy foretold a crisis global in scope in which governments would exercise force over individual conscience. Isn’t it time to look again at what the Bible foretells?
Notes
1. https://healthpolicy-watch.news/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/advance-DRAFT_Negotiating-Text_INB-Bureau_16-Oct-2023.pdf
2. https://brownstone.org/articles/amendments-who-ihr-annotated-guide/
3. David Bell, March 3, 2023, “What the Who Is Actually Proposing,” https://brownstone.org/articles/what-the-who-is-actually-proposing/, accessed 2024-01-16.
4. Fascism is classically defined as a union of government and private business, or, as more recently relabeled, “government and private partnership.”
5. David Bell, Amendments to WHO’s International Health Regulations: An Annotated Guide, Feb. 1, 2023, https://brownstone.org/articles/amendments-who-ihr-annotated-guide/
6. See note 1.
7. See note 1.
8. United States Constitution, Amendment I, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
9. See note 1. PPPR, Article 12.1.
10. Sample “One Health” links: https://www.who.int/health-topics/one-health; https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/index.html; https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2022/08/one-health-disease-climate-future-pandemics/
11. Revelation 16:13-14 foretells a culmination of events, when fallen angels are dispatched in special deceptive power to sway the minds of world political leaders. The demonic goal is to gather them together, to unite their authority and influence against God. The same dragon, beast, and false prophet entities described in chapter 16 are seen in chapters 12-13 using their mouths against God. The dragon to devour baby Jesus (12:4), accuse God’s people (12:10), and destroy the church (12:15-16); the beast to speak blasphemies (12:5-6); and the false prophet to speak as a dragon and influence people to make an image to the beast (13:11, 14-15). Without detailing it in this resource, the beast represents the Papacy, the false prophet represents America under the control of apostate Protestantism, and the dragon represents Satanic working through secular and spiritualistic agencies. “Except for those who are kept by the power of God, through faith in His word, the whole world will be swept into the ranks of this delusion.” The Great Controversy, p. 562.
